User
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 22, 2012, 09:02:21 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Search
TEST AD HERE!
News
The new forum is up and running! Get posting everybody!
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Article mentioning Kirsten in Guardian newspaper  (Read 549 times)
hawkwood
Newbie
*
Posts: 11


View Profile
« on: May 24, 2007, 11:31:31 PM »

There is an article appearing in 'The Guardian' today that mentions Kirsten's upcoming directorial project this summer:

http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,2087163,00.html

Logged
matrox
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 60


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2007, 10:17:04 AM »

Seems most actors eventually feel the need to be behind the camera at some point.  I look forward with interest to see what Kirsten comes up with.
Logged
hamlet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 280


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2007, 06:12:42 PM »

Kind of creepy article.  I wonder how much truth there is in it?  If it is 50% on point, it is a pretty strange environment. 

It does make a little sense to me that the movie studios try to sabotage stars as directors and producers. The movie studios are dependent on that talent and think they have to be in control of that scarce resource.

I think maybe a similar thing happens in  that directors (maybe actors too) sabotage screenwriters, possibly because of their dependence on them.  I still have hope that Spielberg-Geffen-Katzenberg's production company will be fundamentally different in how they treat all the artists.  They are at least big enough to contend.

So KD, go in with your eyes open and with rubber bands over your money. 

Hamlet
"There is no beauty in an empty room."
Logged
markkegel
Full Member
***
Posts: 103



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2007, 08:39:27 PM »

The writer of this article seems frustrated to me, therefore I think its not according to reality. Although I think it's a business where you have to keep your eyes wide open.
Logged
gkfi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 675


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2007, 11:36:56 AM »

Here's another article related to the Guardian newspaper one

http://www.cinematical.com/2007/05/25/director-alex-cox-says-hes-on-hollywood-blacklist-lashes-out-a/

Alex Cox is not too found of Hollywood. Perhaps this is because he says that he was blacklisted in 1988, when he used Universal's cash to make a film in Nicaragua while collaborating with the Sandinistas. Before that, he had a couple of really prominent cult indie flicks. The first was Emilio Estevez's repossession adventure The Repo Man, and the second was the Gary Oldman-starring biopic of Sid Vicious -- Sid and Nancy. Now he's got Searchers 2.0 on the horizon, and he's found the time to write up a little rant for The Guardian about actors-turned-directors.

It looks like this is all coming about from Madonna, who is currently filming a short film in London based on her life, and aptly called Filth and Wisdom. (Not to be confused with the other directorial project she's been attached to.) Cox then threw in Kirsten Dunst, whose directorial start I posted about in April. In what he considers short films "exciting for connoisseurs of awful movies," Cox goes on to wonder if these stints will be like Johnny Depps short, The Brave, or Vincent Gallo's Brown Bunny. That seems like a bit of a jump. Wondering if Dunst's short will resemble the penis-worshipping Bunny is... I don't know, like wondering if David Lynch's next movie will be a Julia Roberts-heading romcom. Besides, she was asked to do it as part of the Reel Moments series that brings reader's ideas to the short screen. It's not quite the same as ego-filled cinematic masturbation.

Now, he does have some points. In the piece, he mentions when Brando fired Stanley Kubrick and Sam Peckinpah from One-Eyed Jacks. One of the more recent and prevalent accounts of this is American History X, which Tony Kaye fought to get his name removed from when Edward Norton reportedly re-edited the film. There's also all those behind-the-scenes flareups, from Lindsay Lohan to David O. Russell. While I do agree that some egos need to be shot down, it's a bit one-dimensional to say that actors "are not, as a rule, highly intelligent." Many aren't, but what about all of those who've made impressive switches? Who would have thought that the dumb sidekick in Aspen Extreme would also direct films from Very Bad Things to Friday Night Lights? Or that the man who was afraid of a mouse on Sex and the City would later write the screenplay for Capote? Cox has had his say, now what do you think about the whole scenario?
Logged
hamlet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 280


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2007, 07:40:30 PM »

Good article find, gfki.  Alex Cox was unfair to Kirsten, maybe more so to Madonna. People  simply should not prejudge.  But Cox  does say that Kirsten has a chance,  and mentions that Orson Welles was one such actor who did well as a director (a small  understatement).  To a person who knows little, it looks like the movie industry is schizo--with the talented (right side brain) people interested in telling an organic  story and the business people (movie brass, and some producers -- left brained) interested in micro managing everything to make  money.  No wonder it's hard to make a good movie OR make money. The two sides are not on the same team. 

I  think all people should try different creative things ----  it's great that Kirsten is doing so.  But Hollywood is a mess--and I hope she protects her happiness, and I hope she doesn't use her money. 

Hamlet
Logged
gkfi
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 675


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2007, 12:51:50 AM »

I'm sure by making this directing decision, someone as experienced in this industry as Kirsten must thought the whole thing through. She loves to try different creative things-- painting, taking photographs and writing, so try out her directorial talent in a short film is a smart first step. Besides, she was asked to do it as part of the Reel Moments series, so even less pressure.

I'm very interested to see how Kiki's very first directorial effort turn out to be.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.12 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC